SLP Induction VS. K&N for 3.4 - FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com Message Board

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

SLP Induction VS. K&N for 3.4

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • SLP Induction VS. K&N for 3.4

    Which is better?

    I am imagining the SLP will be better since it costs more (much more) but that's not always the case, I don't know which one to get. Any help?

  • #2
    Re: SLP Induction VS. K&N for 3.4

    what year?
    which intakes? link or pictures or something

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: SLP Induction VS. K&N for 3.4

      Im interested to see where this goes, as I didnt know that SLP made and intake for the 3.4.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: SLP Induction VS. K&N for 3.4

        The 3.4 liter V6, years 93-95

        K&N:
        http://www.sfxperformance.com/parts/KNN5730101.htm

        SLP:
        http://www.exoticperformanceplus.com....html?item=531

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: SLP Induction VS. K&N for 3.4

          K&N is fine. thats what i run and im pretty satisfied with it, besides it being a PITA to tighten the filter down to the tube inside the fender

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: SLP Induction VS. K&N for 3.4

            wow - slp costs alot. I cant imagine the difference be to great if at all. I do like the design of the SLP's much better
            1994 3.4L DSG Camaro
            Comp Cam 260h w/ 1.6 rockers, J&M STB, UMI 3pt SFC's, Spohn RCA's + Adj. PHR, KYB AGX Shocks, PS Headers, Cutout, Posi Rear w/3.42's, Aluminum DS, Wings West Body Kit, SS Hood/Spoiler, 17" TT2's 9.5/11" 275/315's, 5% tint
            sigpic

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: SLP Induction VS. K&N for 3.4

              Originally posted by IwannaCamarosoBad View Post
              Im interested to see where this goes, as I didnt know that SLP made and intake for the 3.4.
              I had no clue SLP made an intake for the 3.4 either. It would be nice to see pics of a camaro that it is installed on.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: SLP Induction VS. K&N for 3.4

                Originally posted by jnxV6 View Post
                I had no clue SLP made an intake for the 3.4 either. It would be nice to see pics of a camaro that it is installed on.
                Pics and a video lol

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: SLP Induction VS. K&N for 3.4

                  well which one should i go for SLP or K&N

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: SLP Induction VS. K&N for 3.4

                    The gains from a CAI aren't substantial enough to notice the difference between two relatively well-designed intakes. Is cost a factor? If so, the K&N looks like a better deal. If you want to spend more money for more-or-less the same product, buy the SLP.
                    Black \'94 Trans Am A4- SLP CAI & Loudmouth<br />Red \'93 Firebird A4- Ram Air under the WS6 hood, !cat, exhaust.

                    Comment

                    Latest Topics

                    Collapse

                    There are no results that meet this criteria.

                    FORUM SPONSORS

                    Collapse
                    Working...
                    X