The goal with my firebird is to eventually be F/I, and since its not going to be a track car I dont really care about lag, I just want something that is fun to drive. What Im wondering is whether a traditional turbo setup or a rear mount turbo is cheaper and easier to fabricate, also if anyone has a case for going s/c route please make it known since im looking for the best overall route.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Rear Mount Vs. Traditional setup
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Re: Rear Mount Vs. Traditional setup
Sigh....
These should be in a sticky somewhere...*hint* *hint*
http://forum.camarov6.com/showthread...ght=rear+mount
http://forum.camarov6.com/showthread...ght=rear+mount
http://forum.camarov6.com/showthread...ght=rear+mount
http://forum.camarov6.com/showthread...ght=rear+mount
http://forum.camarov6.com/showthread...ght=rear+mount
http://forum.camarov6.com/showthread...ght=rear+mount
http://forum.camarov6.com/showthread...ght=rear+mount
http://forum.camarov6.com/showthread...ght=rear+mount
http://forum.camarov6.com/showthread...ght=rear+mount
http://forum.camarov6.com/showthread...ght=rear+mount
http://forum.camarov6.com/showthread...ght=rear+mount
http://forum.camarov6.com/showthread...ght=rear+mount
http://forum.camarov6.com/showthread...ght=rear+mountsigpic
1997 Camaro RS A4
2006 Chevy Colorado
2003 Kawasaki Ninja ZX6-R
Comment
Latest Topics
Collapse
-
by ssms5411Went ahead and moved my starter wire from the back, to the front again since it had no effect on my drain on the battery. Also made me nervous driving...1 week ago
Comment