For-Real Ram Air - FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com Message Board

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

For-Real Ram Air

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • For-Real Ram Air

    I put one of RKSport's fiberglass, replica SS hoods on my 01 last month.

    A couple of days ago, I was out road testing on a run to make sure my calibration was going to work with nitrous but, before I even hit the bottle, I noted the engine was lean. So I went back to the shop.

    I looking at my HPTuners' VCM Scanner logs and thinking about this for a while, I decided that the RKSport's hood cold air induction works so well that even at highways speeds its functionality is causing the engine to run lean at WOT.

    I went in with VCM Editor and changed the high end of the MAF cal by 5-6% and Viola! I was back at .85-.87 Lambda.

    5-6% increase in airflow is a lot. I was amazed that an SS hood could make that much difference at 60-80-mph.

    With the revised calibration, I made a few test runs with my Nitrous Supply system. I'm almost ready to go back to the chassis dyno and run the nitrous there.

  • #2
    Re: For-Real Ram Air

    Did you get to record the change in CFM from the maf tables?

    I've got a WS6 hood waiting to go on mine, but it'll be feeding a turbo lol!

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: For-Real Ram Air

      I did not record the changes in each cell. I would have figure that from the before and after MAF tables and I don't have the time. I can tell you in general it was 5-6% increase in airflow.

      Using HPT, I can generate a table of the changes. I did that for you but, on this site, I can't post images directly to a forum post on this site unless the image I have for you is already on the web, which it is not.

      Email me at finspeed@netmotive.net and I'll send you the image.

      Keep in mind that our induction systems are vastly different and my hood is a 'glass replica. My numbers might not be valid for your application, but...it's a starting point. You'll need to take some data as to lambda error with each hood to find out how much of a difference it makes for your car.
      Last edited by Hib Halverson; 12-14-2013, 09:01 AM.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: For-Real Ram Air

        The thing is though, you won't see the same results on the chassis dyno unless you have a big enough fan to replicate wind speeds at 60-80 mph on the roads. SS and WS6 hoods have always added a small amount of power, but it's unmeasurable because it requires the car to actually be moving.
        aka FreedStyle
        Chaddrich Freed

        (1 of 443) 2002 SLP Firebird GT #107 (244rwhp/254rwtq naturally aspirated)
        2008 Silverado Crew Cab 5.3L 4x4

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: For-Real Ram Air

          My testing was not done on a chassis dyno.

          it was done on the road using a Innovate Motorsports wide-band. I took lambda error data and applied that to the existing MAF cal.

          My shop is at sea level and the test road was in the nearby hills on a section of uphill highway. It's a great place to do WOT tests in third gear.

          Testing showed the engine at high MAF frequencies was 5-6% lean. Making a 5-6% change brought the engine back to .85-.87 lambda.

          When I go run on the chassis dyno in a few weeks, the fans I'll have won't force enough air to simulate highway speed so I'll either just let it run rich or change the cal.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: For-Real Ram Air

            Ram Air hoods are good, but ram air kit is even better. I have a ram air hood, but it wasn't till I got the ram air kit did I really feel the difference and the filter is always dirty.

            Comment

            Latest Topics

            Collapse

            There are no results that meet this criteria.

            FORUM SPONSORS

            Collapse
            Working...
            X