hp calculators? - FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com Message Board

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

hp calculators?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • hp calculators?

    you guys know of any good ones?

    I looked at a few all over the net...

    based off of ET I they all say about 240ish, and off of mph 250ish...


    any others you guys reccomend because these numbers seeem a bit inflated...

  • #2
    i have a formula that is pretty close to accurate normally, you take the ET/5.825, then cube that number, then take the weightofcar/the cubed number, so a 14.46 at 3400lbs(guess), it took 222.8hp to run that quick
    <b>Black</b> 1998 Pontiac <i>Firebird</i> A-4 swap<br />271.4rwhp/259.4rwtq NA<br />13.30@102.44 <br /><a href=\"http://www.freewebs.com/wickedsix98\" target=\"_blank\">www.freewebs.com/wickedsix98</a>

    Comment


    • #3
      My raceweight was probably more...

      my 3.4L weighed a best of 3160 full interieo, this car has more options, bigger motor. So I assume 3300, I weigh 300, so 3600.

      I got 234.99 hp near that 240 mark...

      do you have one off of mph, that seems to be a better calculator on average, at least from what I woudl understand.

      Comment


      • #4
        http://home.att.net/~khandlon/hpcal.html

        I have to tinker w/ the weight to get probably a more acturate rwhp number, but gives you a good idea.
        Keith - 99 'maro - White M5 - bumpstick and boltons - 13.65 @ 101 N/A
        "I ain't too big to listen to the rumors, I'm just too @#$% big to pay attention to them" - Dr. Dre
        http://seppo.hopto.org/

        Comment


        • #5
          i had another one for MPH but i cant find it...
          <b>Black</b> 1998 Pontiac <i>Firebird</i> A-4 swap<br />271.4rwhp/259.4rwtq NA<br />13.30@102.44 <br /><a href=\"http://www.freewebs.com/wickedsix98\" target=\"_blank\">www.freewebs.com/wickedsix98</a>

          Comment


          • #6
            yeah that one estimates...

            Based on ET
            237.60 rear wheel hp
            273.24 flyeheel hp :rolleyes: I wish

            MAsed on MPH
            247.50 rear wheel hp
            284.11 flywheel hp :rolleyes: again...


            It estimated my car as 3640...

            Comment


            • #7
              I took off the 40 lbs for spare and jack...

              only dropped my hp about 3-5 hp.


              DO you guys really think its like that? Even I think its a little high, I know these things are just "ballparkish" but damn....

              I really wanna get a weight on my car...

              Comment


              • #8
                i like to use www.prestage.com
                one thing to remember though, use a calculator that uses your trap speed to figure out your hp. that is the measure of power you get at the track.
                ET is a function of how well your chassis and gearing are working more than power. if your car hooks perfectly you can get a reasonable idea from et, but mph will yield the more accurate answer.

                later
                tim
                NJ SPEEDER<br />1976 Camaro LT<br />Crate 350, TH350, 3.90 posi<br />New Jersey F-Body Owners Association<br /><a href=\"http://www.NJFBOA.org\" target=\"_blank\">www.NJFBOA.org</a>

                Comment


                • #9
                  <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by njspder:
                  i like to use www.prestage.com
                  one thing to remember though, use a calculator that uses your trap speed to figure out your hp. that is the measure of power you get at the track.
                  ET is a function of how well your chassis and gearing are working more than power. if your car hooks perfectly you can get a reasonable idea from et, but mph will yield the more accurate answer.

                  later
                  tim
                  <hr></blockquote>


                  Yeah that is why I asked for a mp[h calculator...

                  either way yours came up with 241 hp

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I dont know, I guess my 3.4L has about 185 flywheel horse with just exhaust and intake (a few suspension mods)...

                    I dont think I gained 25 horse with just that, maybe subtract 10 hp... haha i dont think it's that accurate.

                    Estimated vehicle weight : 3481, seems somewhat accurate.
                    <a href=\"http://home.comcast.net/~beer13oy/carpage.html\" target=\"_blank\"><b>1995 3.4 Liter M5 Camaro</b></a><br />A few mods...<br />still slow.<br /><br /><a href=\"http://www.mnfbody.com\" target=\"_blank\">Minnesota F-body</a>

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      WOW, first time I feel one of these were kinda close
                      I entered:
                      210 lbs for driver
                      550 lbs weight reduction from stock 3450
                      (Best race weight was 2950)
                      ET 12.48
                      MPH 110.95
                      A4 tranny

                      Calculated:
                      estimated weight 2971
                      RWHP per ET 302.10
                      RWHP per MPH 316.69

                      I have put down 315 RWHP like 2 years ago.

                      First time one of these were close, hmmm
                      Race car - gone but not forgotten - 1997 firebird V6
                      nitrous et & mph: 12.168 & 110.95 mph, n/a 13.746 & 96.38 mph
                      2013 Dodge Challenger SRT8: 12.125, 116.45
                      2010 Ford Taurus SHO: no times yet

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        meow
                        ~The Guru\'s Guru~<br />1999 Camaro,K&N,!MAF<br />!airsilencer,3.08s,<br />NGK-TR6\'s,Taylor Blue 8mm wires,FRAM,A4,Catco Cat, Magnaflow 3 inch catback,transgo shift kit<br />Waiting: RK sport headers, custom y pipe electric cutout<br /><a href=\"http://www.cardomain.com/id/divinejc\" target=\"_blank\">www.cardomain.com/id/divinejc</a>

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Most calculators are ego inflators. They are old and simply do not consider aerodynamics.

                          Using those calulators, two vehicles, one being a truck @ 3500 lbs and the other a f-body @ 3500 lbs both run 14.0@100 MPH. Are they both going to make 273 RWHP? No, not at all.

                          It works out that the truck is making near 273 rwhp and the f-body is making near 244 rwhp.

                          Take my wife's 99 V6 Mustang. It made 167 rwhp and ran 15.3's@91 MPH. Using the old calculators, it would have made near 188 rwhp. If it made near 188 rwhp, the car would have went almost 95 mph with the car weighing @ 3200 race weight, which it does weigh.

                          I would bet your 3.8L weighs with you in at 3500 lbs. I would bet you make around 212 rwhp @ that weight.

                          For newer aerodynamic cars, use 5.63 instead of 5.825 and 243 instead of 234.
                          2003 Lightning 12.618@112.80<br />1996 Camaro Z28 11.751@115.96 MPH soon stupid fast!<br />1999 Mustang V6 15.36@90.92 MPH<br /><br /><a href=\"http://www.geocities.com/jmaxnakron/\" target=\"_blank\">1996 Camaro Z28</a> <a href=\"http://www.geocities.com/jmaxnakron/Melissa_V6_Mustang\" target=\"_blank\">1999 Mustang V6</a> <a href=\"http://www.geocities.com/jmaxnakron/Ford_svt_lightning\" target=\"_blank\">2003 Lightning</a>

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I came up with 409 and 399rwhp on prestage.com [img]graemlins/popcorn.gif[/img]
                            2004 CE Corvette 10.86@132mph
                            1996 Supercharged/Nitrous Camaro RS (For Sale)
                            2011 Cadillac CTS-V
                            2011 Mitsubishi Eclipse Spyder GT-P
                            2006 Mitsubishi Eclipse GS

                            Comment

                            Latest Topics

                            Collapse

                            • LETZRIDE
                              New Owner!
                              by LETZRIDE
                              I am happy to announce that I have sold the site to Robert (FirebirdGT). Years ago this site went down when TealV6 had it, I bought it, refreshed it,...
                              2 days ago
                            • ssms5411
                              Little work today
                              by ssms5411
                              Went ahead and moved my starter wire from the back, to the front again since it had no effect on my drain on the battery. Also made me nervous driving...
                              2 weeks ago
                            • LETZRIDE
                              Tom Henry RS Pt 4: Suspension Mods, Tires, Wheels, Headers and other Cool Stuff
                              by LETZRIDE


                              Building the Tom Henry RS
                              Part 4: Suspension Mods, Tires, Wheels, Headers and other Cool Stuff.
                              By: Hib Halverson


                              At the end of Part Three, we changed the valvetrain of the 3.8-liter V6 in the Tom Henry RS. We installed new, Yella Terra "Ultralite" 1.8:1, aluminum roller rocker arms, Katech valve springs and Katech titanium retainers on our 3800 Series II V6.
                              Ultralites are nearly 25% lighter than the stock 1.6 rockers and 8% lighter than the SLP aluminum...
                              02-07-2020, 10:30 PM

                            FORUM SPONSORS

                            Collapse
                            Working...
                            X