Welcome to the FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com forums.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
why would gm go and screw up a good thing? the vette is in a class of its own because it is a front engine/rear drive car and it either hangs with or hand the asses to the majority of the exotics out there(not to mention other front engine/rear drive cars like the viper :D ). the next big vette will make them cry. if they went mid, id lose all respect for the vette.
current car- 95 Trans am- bolt ons, parked and collecting dust. why? because **** it
my pics or the ones in the article? the pics I found are on google images under corvette indy. It was a ligitamate concept car, bout the same time that knight rider 3000 came out with the banshee in it. (Not that that was the first appearance of a banshee)
if they went mid, id lose all respect for the vette.
I don't understand why you would lose respect for progression... If they go mid-engine, and improve the car overall because of it, why would you be against that? If it stays at the affordable price tag and can whoop a few exotics, it's still a good statement whether its front or mid-engine. It kind of says, hey, we can pull off what Ferrari and Lambo could do for ages, and do it cheaper, maybe even better?
correct me if i'm wrong but the vette now is a mid engine rear drive car ? it least i know thats what gm calls it .
no, it's front engine rear drive. i've never heard them call it that but it's probably got close to 50/50 weight distribution which might lead to someone calling it like a mid engine rear drive car..?
correct me if i'm wrong but the vette now is a mid engine rear drive car ? it least i know thats what gm calls it .
A mid engine places the engine behind the driver but before the rear axle. Because it has a near 50/50 distribution doesn't make it mid engine, that's just called damn good engineering.
Let's flip a coin. Heads I get tail, Tails I get head.
ok , i'm wrong . but i do know that the motor is pushed back into the engine bay way far to get it that 50 /50 ratio . i geuss thats why i think it's a mid engine car .
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Tweet
Comment