Welcome to the FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com forums.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I'm surprised there hasn't been a thread about it yet. For anyone who hasn't seen the video, its a pretty controversial documentary created by the research a group did on the events taking place on September 11th, 2001. It definitely makes you wonder, and surely has lead me to ask some questions.
I'm not particularly taking any side, and bare in mind that I am ignorant.
What do you know that I don't that makes this video seem like such hogwash?
I don't have a ton of time to respond to this, so I cannot articulate all of my thoughts.
Basically, you can take clips and documents over 50 years, put a handful together and make it look like "evidence" when it is really coincidence. Also, they only present information to sway you one way, the do not present both sides.
Example: Take the buildings falling like a "controlled fall". They do not present the SCIENTIFIC reason they fell that way. It's documented and well known. If the buildings were part of a controlled destruction it would have been done from the bottom. Finally, the clips they show make it look like the buildings fall neatly. They do not. They destroyed many surrounding buildings over 10 acres wide.
Crap like this is designed to convince people w/o showing all of the evidence. It is clearly yellow journalism that attempts to look real and convincing.
They are conspiracy "theorists" not scientists for a reason. I am a scientist; therefore, I base my decisions on facts. :rant:
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Tweet
Comment