Got beat by a 04 Jetta 1.8t - FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com Message Board

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Got beat by a 04 Jetta 1.8t

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Got beat by a 04 Jetta 1.8t

    From a dead stop by 60 he had me by about a car length. We stopped afterwards and all he had done was an intake. Should i have beat him or are these things fast?
    Mods:<br />Whisper lid, free ram air, high flow cat, 3\" catback, flowmaster 80 series, 160* thermo, Jet stage II, 18\" Breyton rims on 245 kuhmos

  • #2
    they're good for low 15s stock if driven right so yes. Just be thankful he didn't have a chip or else he would have gotten more than a car. [img]smile.gif[/img]

    Comment


    • #3
      i hate how u can throw a chip in a VW and it does so much :mad:
      \"Well, we don\'t care how bad-*** some dude\'s N/A Honda S2000 motor is; if you go up against 900+ pushrod ponies and 750 pounds of earth-shaking torque with a wrong-wheel-drive econobox, you\'re gonna get a fast and furious old-school ***-whipping.\"

      Comment


      • #4
        yea well the turbo helps just a little bit
        <a href=\"http://www.cardomain.com/id/sean37\" target=\"_blank\">Black \'97 Camaro</a> w/ CAI, catback

        Comment


        • #5
          I don't know about low 15s.
          The audi 1.8T is a 16 second car, which is the same thing as the jetta. I can beat the 1.8Ts all day long.. I think he had more than intake if he beat you by a car.
          <b><a href=\"http://members.cox.net/95batmobile/d86f.jpg\" target=\"_blank\">Sinister Six©</b></a><br /><a href=\"http://www.sounddomain.com/id/95batmobile\" target=\"_blank\">My \'95 Bird</a><br />I am not afraid of storms, for I am learning how to sail my ship.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by 95Batmobile:
            I can beat the 1.8Ts all day long.. I think he had more than intake if he beat you by a car.
            ummm......no

            Go find one that can drive. I've seen SRT-4s run 14.8 before what's your point?

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by 04SRT-4:
              </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by 95Batmobile:
              I can beat the 1.8Ts all day long.. I think he had more than intake if he beat you by a car.
              ummm......no

              Go find one that can drive. I've seen SRT-4s run 14.8 before what's your point?
              </font>[/QUOTE]2004 Silver Metallic Dodge SRT-4

              SOLD!!!
              1999 Chevy Camaro Y87 A4 V6
              Best ET: 15.21 @ 88.80mph
              a.k.a. 99camaro99 (no I'm not trolling...just stickin around for the FL section so please don't bug me thank you)

              Plz don't turn into another "oooh gotta defend all 4 bangers because I drive one now" person. I do beat the Jettas, I don't see what is hard to believe about that. I didn't say I beat SRT-4s because I can't, so there is no need for you to get defensive.
              I've beaten more than one 1.8 and I know for a fact one was auto so either they're retarded and can't mash the gas down or they're SLOW! If my car can beat it, they're slow [img]tongue.gif[/img] Because mine is slow too.
              <b><a href=\"http://members.cox.net/95batmobile/d86f.jpg\" target=\"_blank\">Sinister Six©</b></a><br /><a href=\"http://www.sounddomain.com/id/95batmobile\" target=\"_blank\">My \'95 Bird</a><br />I am not afraid of storms, for I am learning how to sail my ship.

              Comment


              • #8
                95Batmobile

                If your going to tell someone to quit defending 4 bangers, you quit defending 6 bangers. Fair enough? Alot of people seem to have a hard time when hearing a 6cyl Camaro gets beat and in this topic, you seem to be one. Depending on the year of the Jetta, the story is quite believable.

                Comment


                • #9
                  1.8s come down to:

                  Transmission, AWD or FWD, and vehicle model.

                  A LOT of Audis use the automatic tranny with the electronic shift option and they are slow as PISS. Also, a LOT of audis are AWD, making them even SLOWER because of their weight. And on top of that, Audis are heavier than their VW brothers and sisters because they are a wwhhhoollleee lot more luxurious ....

                  VWs, most are manual transmissions...Most weigh less than Audis...and almost all are FWD, cutting down on even MORE weight. Low 15s? EASILLY obtainable in a 1.8T car...
                  Mustangs.. Come to the darkside...<br /><br />The dark side is the path to the shadow of greed. =D

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    95Bat...you might wanna read what Solar was saying.

                    I had a 3.8 that ran low 15s and I wasn't "waxing" 1.8Ts with it. I would beat one or two stock ones here and there but it sure as hell wasn't by much. Plus you have a 3.4L makes it even harder to believe. I'm sorry if ya don't like it.

                    As for defending my car...I'm not defending I'm stating facts. Would it make you feel better if I told you an LS1 would murder me on topend. There I said it...happy? [img]smile.gif[/img]

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      yall fight about some stupid ****
                      2001 Black Camaro<br /><br /><br />I have no clue how i beat you.....maybe your car is slow.<br /><br />Whisper lid, SSRA, Pacesetter Headers, Carsound 3\" Cat, SLP Loudmouth, BMR strut brace, black ZR-1 rims, Xenon kit

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Solar - I don't know where you get the impression that I think our cars are fast and can't be beaten or something, incase you didn't read my whole post:
                        "Because mine is slow too."
                        I said that. Soooo... yeah.
                        And 04SRT I didn't say I "wax" them. I said I beat them all day long. Thx for taking what I said way out of context to make your argument against me sound better [img]smile.gif[/img]
                        BTW, on my g-tech I trapped 89+ mph multiple times... take it for whats its worth [img]smile.gif[/img]
                        <b><a href=\"http://members.cox.net/95batmobile/d86f.jpg\" target=\"_blank\">Sinister Six©</b></a><br /><a href=\"http://www.sounddomain.com/id/95batmobile\" target=\"_blank\">My \'95 Bird</a><br />I am not afraid of storms, for I am learning how to sail my ship.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          ...and you should know that G-tech's MPH are way high. I trapped 94 on my g-tech on my V6...look at me real world MPH. You're around 84 through the traps, as expected. [img]smile.gif[/img]

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            You might have had something resembling a good point until you mentioned your G-tech trap speed...... [img]graemlins/slap.gif[/img] ;)
                            -Eric<br />2002 Navy Blue Camaro...Striped and Stalled. 35th Anniversary SS wheels <br />Best ET: 15.384 @ 88.32 on street tires<br />Project Whitney: Goal, 14.0 1/4 by summer 2008.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by 95Batmobile:
                              take it for whats its worth [img]smile.gif[/img]
                              That's why I said that [img]smile.gif[/img]
                              Doesn't change the fact the fact that I can beat the 1.8ts [img]smile.gif[/img]
                              <b><a href=\"http://members.cox.net/95batmobile/d86f.jpg\" target=\"_blank\">Sinister Six©</b></a><br /><a href=\"http://www.sounddomain.com/id/95batmobile\" target=\"_blank\">My \'95 Bird</a><br />I am not afraid of storms, for I am learning how to sail my ship.

                              Comment

                              Latest Topics

                              Collapse

                              There are no results that meet this criteria.

                              FORUM SPONSORS

                              Collapse
                              Working...
                              X