Some insight into the 3.4L OHV RWD motor - FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com Message Board

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Some insight into the 3.4L OHV RWD motor

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Some insight into the 3.4L OHV RWD motor

    Hi there. Lots of you know me if you have been here a while. A lot of you don't know me either. My name is Russell and I have been here since firebirdv6.com/camarov6.com got it's start. I have owned a 3.4L Chevy Camaro since 1996 and have been on a "quest for more power" since I bought it. It's peppy enough from the get go with a manual transmission but the automatic is lacking a little bit. Even with the manual, it still has issues putting out enough power to push the massive 3250lbs that is the car itself. When you add speakers or anything else this becomes a serious hinderance to the car in terms of performance.

    I have seen posts regarding the 3.4L engine, and I have seen both facts and fiction on this motor thrown around in an attempt to sway people one way or the other. Thats not what I'm trying to accomplish here. Here is my honest opinion about the 3.4L OHV (204ci) RWD engine that comes in the 1993-1995 F-body (Camaro/Firebird). Most of you will be like "oh great whatever". Those of you that know that I have been here and most often won't post in a thread unless I have something important to voice on the matter will stop and read this. And a few of you will be genuinely curious to know what it is I'm trying to convey. Pull up something to drink and some popcorn, this promises to be a long thread.

    --

    I have done my share of research on this engine. I even contacted GM and asked them for any information they had on the car. They promptly sent me the GM Rebuild Kit for the 1994 Chevrolet Camaro. It didn't cost me a thing and this little packet included every bit of information, original brochures from 1994, a full detailed listing of all options and factory information on every part of the engine, car, chassis, etc.

    It was here that I began, studying and calculating and realizing the first thing about the motor. GM Lied. It wasn't a big lie. The motor is advertised at 207 Cubic Inches, but using valid formulas for calculating CID I came up short at only 204. I rechecked several times and came to the conclusion that GM rounded up the engine size because in reality, the "3.4L" engine is really only 3.35 Liters. Now .05 Liters isnt a huge deal..but when you start with so little, every bit counts.

    Armed with this information I began signing up to different boards and clubs with the hopes of finding people who had begun to modify the car and make it work better. I came across a lot of owners who were frustrated because they hadn't found anything created by the aftermarket and had given up and advised me to do the same. My Camaro, is honestly my first car. It's the first car I ever purchased and still runs strong to this day. I didn't let anyone's dismay sway me from my goal of making my car work better for me, and not go out and try to win any awards for the most horsepower or torque or anything like that. When I discovered RKSport and their aftermarket products for the 3.4L, my hopes perked up because I realized that if I saved up enough money I could make my car work better. I began to research different engine shops in the area and stumbled across Norris Racing Tech (NRT) with their 3500 package which promised to make the engine a 3.5 Liter and give you the best performance you could get. But at 3000.00 for the engine package + shipping/handling I wrote that off.

    Now I have to digress a little because I realize I skipped a very important point. Most 3.4L owners try too hard. You think that you can take your 3.4L V6 and run out and make it faster than any car on the road. That’s not going to happen. There will always be, whether you own a 3.4L v6 - a 3.8L v6 - a LT1 - LS1 – Vette – Viper – Porsche – Ferrari, a car faster than yours. The thing I realized that if I built the car for me, if I did things I wanted and questioned the conventional wisdom of “that won’t work” I would stumble across the magical mod that would give me a massive boost in the right direction. I stayed on these boards for years, watching people come on and ask, “what’s the best intake, what’s the best exhaust...” and all those things. I watched people rise and get incredible gains and saw people I knew push the limits of the engine and develop supercharger and turbocharger kits for the 3.4L, as well as take and add nitrous to it. There were a couple of “loch ness” stories about a mythical 3.4L out there running 9’s in the ¼ mile, but that person never signed up to this board or any others that I have visited, so that person remains a mystery as to whether or not they really exist.

    Getting back to my topic – When I realized that I would have to work harder and think more because the things that people were doing weren’t really accomplishing much, I turned to the actual engine design and I looked at several options. I then realized, in 1999, that Pontiac’s Grand Am GT was making 175hp/205tq from a 3.4L OHV FWD motor. I did research into this engine and found that GM had worked a different path on this motor and it was better than the 3.4 RWD. I did more research into engine design and found that runner lengths help determine how much power and torque the engine gets. I looked at the plenum and runner design on the “3400” engine as well as the 3.4 RWD and realized that the RWD runners were jokes. At only 2” long and without any type of airflow acceleration present, they looked like all they served was a means to get the air from the Y shaped plenum, which once I saw a cross section – laughed at, to the cylinders. That was when I decided then and there that the plenum and air intake system was the 3.4L’s weak point. GM had spent money into making the 3.4 into a “Race style” motor. At 60 degrees the Angle of the V shape is natural. EXACTLY replicating the letter V, the angle between cylinders is 60*. The crankshaft in a six cylinder v-type engine has three throws of 120 degrees. With this combination, it makes the engine perfectly internally balanced. No bad vibrations, hence the lack of balance shaft that the 90 degree 3.8 or 3800 series II engine needs to employ to keep the motor from rubbing things the wrong way.

    With that in mind, I kept looking into what I could do to increase the natural power of the engine. And I realized that the FWD heads and intake manifold were direct bolt-on parts. The holes all lined up, and they were aluminum which would shave weight off of the engine. Combined with their increased flow (I had no idea how much at the time) they would add a lot of power to an engine that was struggling. So I did more research and found that the iron heads that came with the RWD engine had been used since the original 2.8L engine came out. No changes had been made by GM. Not till they tried to use the 3.4L as a viable engine for the FWD cars did GM even consider making the 3.4L into a “performance” engine. Because of that the 3.4L has become the laughing stock of the F-body world. Many people have tried to make this engine perform better and succeeded, and many more have failed. Simply because they aren’t thinking before they throw parts at the motor. Most people think, “I can get an exhaust or intake and it’ll make the car work great!” This isn’t always the case. Most often it requires planning to increase the airflow of the engine to efficiently use such parts. Why? Because the 3.4L is anemic to begin with – GM thought that they could simply increase the bore and stroke of the engine and throw a “performance cam” into it and it would work fine. This isn’t the case because the plenum and air intake and exhaust systems are so poorly designed that it suffocates the motor without anyone giving it a second thought. While everyone is putting bigger throttle bodies and porting and polishing heads, they are neglecting the most important idea – “you engine only flows as well as the worst bottleneck.” With that in mind, ponder this thought: I asked James Montigny for his flowbench data from Norris Racing Tech on his heads. And then I asked a good friend of mine who specializes in the FWD 60 degree motor for a stock flowbench of the “3100” heads I had pulled from a 1996 3.1L engine and put on my car.

    The results shocked me. The stock heads from a 1996 FWD 3.1L engine flowed as good as the heads that were bolted to Tiago’s car (many of you know him as the one who developed a turbocharger for the 3.4L and pushed it to the edge). Tiago had gotten his heads from James Montigny previously and James had the NRT engine package. I went to NRT’s site to learn that the full engine package came with the 900.00 option full port/polish and valve job. You can digest that for a minute before carrying on. GM had managed to work the heads on the FWD engines so perfectly that they flowed as well as taking a set of the iron heads and paying someone to R&D a perfect portjob on them. 900.00. Using the aluminum heads means you have 900.00 to use elsewhere.

    hybrid - \'\'hI-br&d - The offspring of a cross between species.
    Co-Founder West Coast F-Bodies
    West Coast F-Bodies Car Club - WCFB Message Board

  • #2
    Re: Some insight into the 3.4L OHV RWD motor

    The first bottleneck is the plenum. While it looks pretty decent, being that the outer size is 3 inches wide by 2.5 inches tall (or somewhere around there – I forget) where the inside is really only like 1.5 – 1.75 inches wide x one inch tall! The plenum has an incredibly thick construction (why I have no idea, its not like you are boosting the motor from the factory) and it makes for very little space for the air to travel inside. Then on top of that the airflow has to split, make two 45 degree turns in order to get to one more 45 degree turn down into the engine. This equates to a lot of bad sharp angles that the airflow has to navigate – effectively slowing it down. The fact that the runners are super short makes for more problems being that there is no way the engine is capable of any top end power, hence the problem with the engine “dying” at 4500 rpm. Ask any 3.4L owner and they will tell you that the engine seems to top out around 4500 rpm. While most people are ok with this, the tachometer shows that the engine has a rev potential of 5500 rpm and a redline of 7k. This is due to the forged steel connecting rods in the engine that can take more abuse than most. The other thing GM didn’t think of – fuel supply. While 16lb injectors come stock on the 2.8-3.4L engine, they are only capable of supplying the engine with enough fuel for a max of 160 hp. (sound familiar?) After you go past 160 hp, the injectors begin to become less and less efficient, costing the driver more in terms of gas mileage and not really working to their full potential. Putting larger injectors helps a good deal.

    All this said, it seems to be that the 3.4L engine is a stout powerplant with untapped potential. I proved this when I bolted the aluminum heads to the block itself. Using a stock 3.4L RWD engine block I mated the Gen III aluminum heads and 3100 intake (1996 model year) along with the fuel rails and larger injectors, the stock 3400 throttle body (50mm, just like the RWD stock tb) and adding RKSport headers (due to the fact that nothing else fit that would work in the RWD engine bay, pacesetter headers would work just as well) I realized a gain in the form of 27RWHP and 30RWTQ. (thats from 140rwhp -> 167rwhp and 183rwtq -> 203 rwtq). Once I took the cutout plate off to open the exhaust fully, it gave me another 3 horsepower and 3 torque (both rearwheel) taking me to 170RWHP and 207RWTQ. That’s a 30 RWHP gain and 24 RWTQ gain. Factor in 15% drivetrain loss and that comes to 200 horsepower at the engine. Now when I started, stock engine save for the 3” catback exhaust and K&N FIPK – I had dynoed at 140RWHP and 183RWTQ – that’s 164 HP and 215 TQ at the crank. Just updating the heads and intake from the restrictive version that GM put on there in 1993-1995 to the ones they were currently using in 1996 gave me an increase of 36 hp and 30 tq (170rw=>200c / 207rw=>245c) over what came from the factory. Then I decided to upgrade to the “3400” parts. I made sure I got a set of heads used on the 1999+ Grand Am GT, which featured bigger valves and roller rocker arms built in, as well as larger runners and ports on the plenum as well as an increased plenum size. I still haven’t dynoed the current setup that I’m running, but it’s enough that to date I have beaten a 1996 Convertible Z28 that was going all out to catch up to me and couldn’t until I decided to let off the gas a little. A 3.4L with parts from GM’s factory shelves, complete with casting flaws – keeping the car from being caught by a stock 1996 Z28. To me that’s a major achievement. I can get the owner of the Z28 to come on here and back me up if you need proof, I’m sure he would help me out. He’s one of the members of my car club.

    I guess the point of all this is that I’m tired of people giving up on this engine. Its got a lot of potential but it is a challenge. You can’t just slap parts on it like you can with the V8. Even the 3.8 is a challenge but the 3.4 has so many design flaws that it comes across as a failure when it simply needs to be “woken up”. I’m tired of hearing that making the 3.4L perform is impossible – it isn’t. If it was then neither myself or Tiago would have gotten any results from our testing and working so hard. It is a challenge though. And it’s not an easy one at that. Lots of time and effort have to be put into it. So if you think you are up to the challenge of making something cool and custom, then stay with the 3.4 and realize your own personalized car at the end. If you want an easy way out, sell your car and buy a V8. I really don’t care either way. But sooner or later everyone will realize that the 3.4 isn’t as bad as they think. If GM had put a little more thought into the 3.4L like they did with the 3800 Series II – then the 3.4 would have been rated in the top 10 engines of all time. 200 hp is achievable in “stock” form. I’ve done it. Can you?

    hybrid - \'\'hI-br&d - The offspring of a cross between species.
    Co-Founder West Coast F-Bodies
    West Coast F-Bodies Car Club - WCFB Message Board

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Some insight into the 3.4L OHV RWD motor

      Thats some good info on the 3.4. I think this should be sticky.
      1995 Patriot Red T-Topped Z28 A4<br /><br />Mystery rebuild in progress.<br /><br />Soon to have 383 ways to beat KBreezy and Shane. :D

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Some insight into the 3.4L OHV RWD motor

        Excellent work Black34V6. Thanks for sharing your experience and results.

        My experiences and observences with the 60 degree V6 have not been favorable to date. Seen so many that have let loose (spun bearings, con-rods through block, etc.). I attribute this to a variety of factors such as:
        1) There are just so many more of these engines out there that the odds are some are going to fail and those are the ones you hear about. You never hear of stories from people about engines that don't give any problems.
        2) Those damn GM intake gaskets.
        3) The vast majority of those engine failures occured after 250,000 kms. (really can't complain about that!)
        4) Most of these engines were installed in cars that are bought by people who have no clue about maintenance. Only when it stops do they think about maintenance (by that time its usually too late!)
        5) Harsh operating enviroment. Around here these poor engines are exposed to quite a temperature range (from summer to winter) and conditions.

        As you have demonstrated, this engine, in the right hands, with the right care, can be reliable and powerfull.

        DZ
        Now Playing: \'99 Pewter Firebird, stock, bone stock, and nothing but stock, so help me God!<br />Comming attractions: K&N Filter, Lid Mod, Intake Bellows Smooth Pipe Mod.<br />I dream about: Forced Induction (TC or SC) or NOX (or both!)

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Some insight into the 3.4L OHV RWD motor

          good god thats alot of info! now wheres the 3.8 one?
          2k2 camaro, K&N, SLP whisper lid, Konis, AEM, HP Tuners, Angel eyes/Halos, CF SS ram air hood, 4.10s, Zexel Torsen, UMI SFCs, CrossFire, BFGs, Gatorback, Catco, Flows, and TLC! DONT feed the Trolls!

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Some insight into the 3.4L OHV RWD motor

            thanks for all the info on the 3.4, i have learned a lot and im gonna apply this to my 3.4L
            i do however have a quick question is the plenum the part that conects to the throttle body, splits into a y and says 3.4 on it? and do you have any pictures of this engine build?
            Last edited by SVTfirebird; 04-18-2006, 12:34 AM.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Some insight into the 3.4L OHV RWD motor

              1) yes. its the Y-shaped thing.
              2)http://camaro.adwire.com/modpics

              hybrid - \'\'hI-br&d - The offspring of a cross between species.
              Co-Founder West Coast F-Bodies
              West Coast F-Bodies Car Club - WCFB Message Board

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Some insight into the 3.4L OHV RWD motor

                the whole problem with the cast iron cylinder heads makes total sense, big props to u on figuring that one out, i was wondering if it would be best to find stock aluminum 3100 heads on ebay or go to a junkyard and rip them off a mid 90's 3100 engine. i also checked my intake plenum today and saw how thick it really is and since i dont have the time or money for a turbo or cetrifugal super, i decided to replace that hiderance as well, what model did u pull ur 3100 intake from and what other models do u think would work on my 3400 i am pretty sure i have the technical savy to pull off the plenum swap, and ill take care of the aluminum heads in probally a year or so. thanks again ur help is greatly appreciated

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Some insight into the 3.4L OHV RWD motor

                  Originally posted by SVTfirebird
                  the whole problem with the cast iron cylinder heads makes total sense, big props to u on figuring that one out, i was wondering if it would be best to find stock aluminum 3100 heads on ebay or go to a junkyard and rip them off a mid 90's 3100 engine. i also checked my intake plenum today and saw how thick it really is and since i dont have the time or money for a turbo or cetrifugal super, i decided to replace that hiderance as well, what model did u pull ur 3100 intake from and what other models do u think would work on my 3400 i am pretty sure i have the technical savy to pull off the plenum swap, and ill take care of the aluminum heads in probally a year or so. thanks again ur help is greatly appreciated
                  u cant do one without the other.

                  plenum + heads swap -- cant do heads without the plenum, or plenum without the heads.

                  hybrid - \'\'hI-br&d - The offspring of a cross between species.
                  Co-Founder West Coast F-Bodies
                  West Coast F-Bodies Car Club - WCFB Message Board

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Some insight into the 3.4L OHV RWD motor

                    any p/n's for the headers, as a the 3X00 swap has been coming up on the third gen side. Custom intake due to the dizzy, unless they switch to DIS using the sensors alredy in 3.4 block. I'll also throw this in again, since it seems pertnant: http://forum.camarov6.com/showthread.php?t=64562
                    1978 Formula 461 in progress of being built :rock:
                    2013 Ram 1500 Big Horn

                    former owner of 85 bird w/ 2.8 - 3.4 - 3800 II - 5.0
                    94 comero 3.4

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Some insight into the 3.4L OHV RWD motor

                      do you have to change the pistons if you put on an aluminum head?

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Some insight into the 3.4L OHV RWD motor

                        Originally posted by camaromalley
                        do you have to change the pistons if you put on an aluminum head?
                        i think i read somewhere that you do in order to have a safe compression ratio.

                        you know, this makes you think, the 3.4 COULD have had 200hp. Buick = the easy way out for GM :).

                        i got a question too. check out this link:

                        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GM_High_Value_engine#LX9

                        it says that the LX9 3500 is based off the 3400 engine. would those heads fit on a 3.4?
                        Last edited by lambo101; 05-17-2006, 07:04 PM.
                        1995 Bluish green 3.4l Camaro.<br />Bone stock right now lol!<br /><a href=\"http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2042355\" target=\"_blank\">http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2042355</a>

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Some insight into the 3.4L OHV RWD motor

                          I've been wondering the same thing.
                          1995 Patriot Red T-Topped Z28 A4<br /><br />Mystery rebuild in progress.<br /><br />Soon to have 383 ways to beat KBreezy and Shane. :D

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Some insight into the 3.4L OHV RWD motor

                            Alright this is my first post here but I've been a member for a long time, I usually just read everything to find out my answers so I have never had to post. But to answer your guys question, Yes. But then it gets a little more involved, but not to much. And it will deffinitly be bit a little more costly. But anyways I have been researching this since the 3500 came out (I used to be a big Grand Am fan and they talk about it a lot since the G6 to the Grand Am's place) and I have it pretty much down, all I need to do is to start buying parts.;)

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Some insight into the 3.4L OHV RWD motor

                              Suposdily the 3400 swap is a real tight fit. after taking my manifolds out of the box friday I believe it. the lower manifold it a lot taller then the 3.4L lower manifold. I hope the 3500 manifold is not any taller, if not shorter.
                              95 Firebird<br /> <a href=\"http://www.cardomain.com/memberpage/673250\" target=\"_blank\">http://www.cardomain.com/memberpage/673250</a> <br /> <a href=\"http://photobucket.com/albums/y217/andrewbrandon19/\" target=\"_blank\">http://photobucket.com/albums/y217/andrewbrandon19/</a> <br /><br />me on a good day------&gt; <a href=\"http://communicatio.webblogg.se/images/wet_cat_113159625.jpg\" target=\"_blank\">linky</a>

                              Comment

                              Latest Topics

                              Collapse

                              • RockAuto
                                More Brake Parts at RockAuto
                                by RockAuto
                                RockAuto is excited to announce the addition of Dynamic Friction to our ever expanding selection of brake parts! Dynamic Friction Company (DFC) is an...
                                1 day ago
                              • 2.8 Bird
                                Ceramic coating vs. Wax
                                by 2.8 Bird
                                Have any of you guys used ceramic coating. I used to use hydrosilex. It's rated #2 as one of the best ceramic coating. It worked pretty good and it...
                                1 week ago
                              • Camaro3800v6
                                Egr and fuel hoses
                                by Camaro3800v6
                                hello, since my 02 camaros egr has been discontinued, had to get an older one (believe it's a 1996 Camaro egr.) Could this cause a problem because it...
                                1 week ago
                              • Mark Thompson
                                Dampener Crank Sensor Issue
                                by Mark Thompson
                                Unable to locate any new or New Old stock high-resolution crankshaft position sensor. Causing issues. The 24x appear to be a discontinued item. Open to...
                                2 weeks ago
                              • ssms5411
                                Throttle percent
                                by ssms5411
                                What’s your guys tunning on throttle percent? Adjusting mine to 70% up to 3200 rpms then 30% up to 6400 rpms. What’s Yours look like?...
                                2 weeks ago

                              FORUM SPONSORS

                              Collapse
                              Working...
                              X